|
VIII. Forest Insects
C.W.
Berisford and G.K. Douce
Southern pine beetle
activity was low during 1996, although there was some early season activity in the
southwestern portion of the state. Infestations in the Piedmont Plateau were rare and no
epidemic populations were reported. The south wide monitoring system based on spring
trapping predicted declining or static populations at all trap locations.
Black turpentine
beetles were locally abundant where other bark beetle infestations had occurred and in
areas which had mechanical damage from construction, fire, logging, etc. Statewide
populations were about average.
Localized heavy
attacks by Ips spp. beetles were reported from several areas in the coastal plain,
usually in associated with hot prescribed bums or wildfires. Other infestations were
centered around lightning strikes.
Pine tip moths,
mostly Nantucket pine tip moth, were common throughout the state. Attacks were
particularly heavy in Christmas tree plantations where chemical control was
inadequate. High infestation levels frequently were found in plantations which had
been established on land previously used for row crops or pasture and in stands which had
received intensive mechanical and/or chemical site preparation prior to planting.
Tip moths have become serious pests in pine plantations where intensive management is
practiced.
Scale insects and
aphids typically increased late in the season and required additional chemical control in
some Christmas tree plantations. Losses to coneworms and seedworms were essentially
the same as those experienced in 1995 with some increased in certain seed orchards.
Reproduction weevils
caused severe localized damage to seedling pines in some areas, particularly where
planting of new seedlings had occurred shortly after stand harvest. Overall,
populations were similar to the previous year.
High localized
infestations of forest tent caterpillar again caused some defoliation of oaks, tupelo gum,
and sweetgum in the coastal plain, particularly in the Chattachoochee river
drainage. Heavy localized infestations of fall webworm were also common in the
coastal plain. Light defoliation by the fall cankerworm was reported at scattered
locations on high mountain ridges.
Four thousand seven
hundred and ten (4710) gypsy moth pheromone traps were set and monitored in Georgia as
part of the 1996 national gypsy moth detection and monitoring program. Seventy-seven
(77) male moths were captured in eight of the forty seven counties in which traps were
operated. In locations where more than one moth was captured, additional pheromone
trap monitoring and on-site inspection were/will be conducted to determine if an isolated
infestation is present. The Georgia Forestry Commission has primary responsibility
for gypsy moth program in Georgia in cooperation with USDA-APHIS-PPQ and other state and
federal agencies.
Estimates
of Losses and Control Costs
Rank |
Insect |
Cost of Control |
Damage |
Total |
1 |
Pine tip moths1 |
$980,000 |
$3,750,000 |
$4,730,000 |
2 |
Ips spp. beetles4 and Black turpentine beetle |
425,000 |
2,658,000 |
3,083,000 |
3 |
Defect and degrade causing insects2 |
100,000 |
2,870,000 |
2,970,000 |
4 |
Seed and cone insects3 |
86,000 |
2,700,000 |
2,786,000 |
5 |
Reproduction weevils5 |
965,000 |
1,170,000 |
2,135,000 |
6 |
Other insects6 |
86,000 |
1,215,000 |
1,301,000 |
7 |
Southern pine beetles |
23,000 |
742,000 |
765,000 |
8 |
Gypsy moth7 |
180,000 |
|
180,000 |
| |
Total |
$2,845,000 |
$15,105,000 |
$17,950,000 |
|
1
Includes Nantucket pine tip moth, pitch pine tip moth and subtropical pine tip moth.
2 Includes carpenter ants, ambrosia beetles, lepidopterous wood borers,
shothole borers and various other cerambycid, buprestid and scolytid beetles.
3 Includes coneworms, seedworms, seed bugs and cone beetles.
4 Ips avulsus, I. grandicollis, I. calligraphus and I.
pini.
5 Pales weevil and pitcheating weevil.
6 Mostly aphids, scale insects, lace bugs, sawflies, and lepidopterous
defoliators.
7 The gypsy moth is not generally established in Georgia, although isolated
infestations have been detected. Therefore, there are no damage estimates and only
monitoring and/or control costs are included. |
|