|
Diseases in Container Tree Nurseries
Excerpt from: Landis, T.T. 1989. Disease and pest management. Pp. 1-99. In T.D. Landis, R.W. Tinus, S.E. McDonald, and J.P. Barnett (eds). The Container Tree Nursery Manual. Volume 5. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agric. Handbook. 674.
Damping-off
Damping-off is a common disease that affects seeds, germinants, and young seedlings
of many plant species, and woody plants are no exception. Traditionally, two different types of
damping-off are recognized: pre-emergence damping-off, which affects seeds and germinants before
they emerge, and postemergence damping-off, which affects young seedlings until their stems become woody.
Both forms of the disease occur in container nurseries and are caused by the same group of
fungi (fig. 1). Damping-off was ranked second among the diseases affecting container seedlings, with a
relative occurrence of 25% based on responses during the Container Nursery Survey.
Hosts. All species of seed and seedlings are affected.
Symptoms/Damage. Pre-emergence damping-off is a difficult disease to diagnose
because the affected seeds are not visible; consequently, the losses are often attributed to "poor seed"
(Baker 1957). If the germinants have not emerged after a reasonable period, the seed should be
excavated and examined; if the seed contents are decayed, then damping-off fungi may be involved.
Sometimes, the germinated seed is killed after the radicle of the seed has emerged.
The classic symptoms of postemergence damping-off (fig. 2, 3) include decay of the seedling hypocotyl
at the ground line, causing the seedling to topple over. Other stresses can produce symptoms similar
to fungal damping-off , but the distinguishing characteristic is the presence of decayed root tissue.
Another germinant disease that is usually classed with postemergence damping-off is
cotyledon blight. This decay of the cotyledons develops when seedborne fungi spread from the
seedcoat during the "birdcage" stage of germination (fig.4).
|
|
Disease development. Pre-emergence damping-off is a fungal decay of seeds and
young germinants and several different fungi can be involved. Traditionally, Rhizoctonia has
been considered to be the major cause of damping-off in ornamental container nurseries (Baker 1957);
Peterson (1974) states that four fungal genera (Pythium, Fusarium, Phytophthora, and
Rhizoctonia) "are being encountered" in container tree nurseries. A search of the literature,
however, reveals that only Fusarium spp. have actually been implicated as a cause of
damping-off of conifer seedlings in containers: Fusarium oxysporum (Schlect.) for Douglas-fir
(Graham and Linderman 1983); Douglas-fir, western larch, grand fir, subalpine fir, and ponderosa pine
(James 1985a); and Douglas-fir and pinyon container seedlings (Landis 1976). Although F.
oxysporum is most commonly mentioned, other members of the genus may also cause damping-off disease
of container seedlings. James (1985a) recovered F. avenaceum from diseased conifer seedlings,
and Pawuk (1978) demonstrated that four seedborne species of Fusarium could produce damping-off of
longleaf pine, that is, F. moniliforme, F. solani, F. roseum, and F. tricinctum. Pythium
spp. have also been isolated from diseased container seedlings, and these fungal pests may be more
common than generally realized; Peterson (1974) concluded that Pythium-infected
The reason that the more traditional damping-off fungi are not being reported from container tree nurseries is probably due to the use of soilless growing
media, which are generally considered to be pathogenfree. Rhizoctonia, Pythium, and
Phytophthora spp. are primarily spread through contaminated irrigation water or
growing media, especially from mixes containing soil (Baker 1957). McCain (1978)
reports that peat is often infested with Pythium and Rhizoctonia
spp., but Stephens and others (1983) could recover neither fungus from non-soil
components of artificial growing media including peat, perlite, and vermiculite.
Coyier (1978) assayed perlite and peat moss samples for bacteria and fungi and found that,
while perlite was sterile, the peat moss samples contained many species of pathogenic and
nonpathogenic fungi and bacteria. James (1987) has regularly isolated
F. oxysporum from the roots of weeds growing in greenhouses.
McElroy (1985) has isolated both Pythium and Fusarium spp. from
unopened bags of container medium; James and Gilligan (1984) reported very high populations
of both pathogens from one brand of growing medium and demonstrated that the recovered
Fusarium isolates could cause damping-off. Kim and others (1975) made fungal
isolations from 52 randomly selected samples of peat and found that all samples contained
Fusarium spp., 29% contained Pythium spp., but no Rhizoctonia spp. were
isolated from any of the peat-based media.
Apparently, seedborne fungi are a primary source of inoculum for damping-off
fungi in container nurseries. Pawuk (1981) found that seedlots of four species of southern
pines were infected with Fusarium spp. at intensities of 54 to 90% and the same author
(Pawuk 1978) found that some Fusarium spp. isolates from longleaf pine seed caused
both pre-emergence and postemergence damping-off. Graham and Linderman (1983) reported
that Fusarium oxysporum isolated from Douglas-fir seed caused significant
pre-emergence damping-off losses. Three species of pathogenic Fusarium were
isolated from spruce seed and seed debris (James 1985b). In an earlier study, James
(1983) recovered Pythium and two Fusarium species from Douglas-fir seed; the
Fusarium spp. were isolated from within the seedcoat. Fusarium spp. have
also been recovered from several species of pine seed in container nurseries in the western
United States, including pinyon and ponderosa pine.
Because container seedlings are spatially isolated in individual cells,
secondary spread of damping-off is not as severe a problem as it is in bareroot nurseries.
When more than one seed is sown per cell, fungal inoculum introduced on seedcoats can
spread to adjacent seedlings and cause damping-off or other diseases, such as root rot, later
in the growing season. Graham and Linderman (1983) report that Fusarium spp.
grew and sporulated on Douglas-fir seedcoats and considered this to be a potential source of
secondary disease spread. Fungal spores from infected seeds could be splashed from
container to container during irrigation.
Other damping-off fungi have been isolated from
growing medium on used containers (Baker 1957) and from dust and
soil particles from the floors of container nurseries (Stephens
and others 1983). James (1987) has isolated Fusarium spp.
from several different types of reusable containers, which had
already been "sterilized" by conventional techniques.
|
| Figure 1. |
|
| Figure 2. |
|
| Figure 3. |
|
| Figure 4. |
Disease management.
Cultural. Damping-off is actually not as common in
container nurseries as it is in bareroot nurseries, and when it does occur, some
environmental or cultural factor is usually involved (table 1). The most important of
these factors is seed quality: fungal contamination is more common in dirty seed lots, and
poor quality seed produce weak germinants that are particularly susceptible to damping-off.
Reusable containers should be carefully cleaned to prevent fungal inoculum from
carrying over to the next crop. Contaminated growing media are a source of fungal
inoculum, and fine-textured mixes often compact and provide an ideal environment for
damping-off fungi. High pH, either in the growing medium or irrigation water, can favor
damping-off, but the low pH of most sphagnum peat should inhibit this fungal disease
(Carlson 1983). Oversowing leads to weak germinants that are more susceptible to
disease. Fertilization with high nitrogen levels and over-irrigation can also
predispose seedlings to damping-off as can a growing environment of high humidity, low
light, and extremely high or low temperatures.
Chemical. Because many of the fungi responsible for damping-off
are seedborne, seeds can be sanitized prior to sowing. Seed treatments include standing
water soaks, running water rinses, and chemical treatments with bleach, hydrogen
peroxide, or fungicides. If a contaminated growing medium is suspected, chemical
fumigation or pasteurization can be attempted. Fungicidal drenches can be applied
after the disease symptoms become evident. This practice is rarely curative: most of
the damage has already been done by the time the chemical is applied. However, drenches
can stop secondary spread of the disease. Sutherland and Van Eerden (1980) conclude
that drenches are seldom effective against damping-off, besides being expensive and
potentially hazardous to the environment.
Table 1. Environmental conditions and cultural practices affecting
damping-off in container tree nurseries
|
Environmental condition or cultural practice |
Effect on Disease Development |
|
Encouraging |
Discouraging |
|
Seed quality |
Dirty or contaminated; slow, weak germinants |
Clean and sterile; vigorous germination |
|
Growing medium |
Contaminated Fine-textured Over-compacted |
Pest-free Mixture of particle sizes Good porosity |
|
pH |
High (>6.5) |
Acid (4.5-6.0) |
|
Growing density |
Oversowing |
One seedling per cavity |
|
Nutrition |
High nitrogen |
Well-balanced fertilization especially phosphorus, potassium,
and calcium |
|
Irrigation |
Frequent, heavy applications |
Frequent, light applications |
|
Growing environment |
High humidity Low light Extreme temperatures |
Moderate humidity Adequate light Ideal temperatures |
Contents
|